Home Forums Reviews Classifieds Gallery Chat Calendar Store Map Player Map Links
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

Messages - Lon3Wo1f

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6
1
When you say M240 gearbox style, is it a direct match to the E1 M240? As in, is the PolarStar M240 engine a drop-in replacement for it?

2
Review & Article Discussion / Re: AEG: JG Tactical AK47 MAG-K (6833)
« on: January 11, 2013, 02:03:20 AM »
Quick question, is the body patterned off the standard LCT/Dboys/Cyma AK bodies or is it patterned off the CA style AK? I ask because I'm looking to drop a Daytonagun AK Kit inside this puppy to watch it sing ;)

3
This is by far the greatest custom airsoft project of all time, topping the China Lake Pump Action Grenade Launcher that renegadecow did.

I haven't browsed through this thread in a while, but I really think you should pick up one of those DIY laser modules and recreate the targeting beam as well. Of course you would install a UV filter over that thing, you don't want to burn a little kid's eye out!

4
If it isn't too late to change your plans regarding the firing mechanism, I would highly suggest making it into a vortex gun instead of using mechboxes (assuming you havent shot down that idea before, I only skimmed the thread)

You are looking to do 700rpm from each one, which translates to 11-12rps from each? Your combined ROF will be ~33rps, which does not quite scale up to splaser potential, which should dominate the field in one way or another (ultra high ROF, high power, anti vehicle/bunker).

A vortex mechanism can bring your ROF up to ~150 rps depending on your air pressure, and I believe the weight of a CO2 tank + reg + electric solenoid system should be equal or less than your 3 mech boxes + 3 individual feeding systems.

Alternatively, I would ditch the idea of using bbs and go for beanie babies or nerf rockets, launched out of the firing tube using CO2 or HPA. That would correlate much more closely with the idea of a splaser having some sort of built in energy source that would actually deplete after a couple of shots.

Either way, I'm impressed with the way this project is turning out. Let's see it go into completion.

5
One last option you can try would be figuring out what happened to the XM110 that was on sale on classicairsoft

Go to that site, look up xm110 in the classifieds section, then try PM'ing the last known owner of the only XM110 to appear on the site. He has been inactive for a long time, but there's a chance he can let you know what happened to it. From there you can always:

1. Try to buy it off him if he still has it
2. Try buying it from the new owner if he sold it.

6
AEG Discussion II / Re: How are the new A&K Masadas?
« on: February 07, 2012, 01:41:52 AM »
I'd rather deal with the possibility of having to replace parts than spend $310 on a gun that doesnt work out of the box.  I don't know about you, but I don't throw my money around, and spending it on a product that is subpar of even the most basic standards is rather frustrating

Actually, I would look at the potential costs first.

Like the folding stock? The PTS will set you back ~90

Like your lipos? The PTS uses a microswitch, which will break extremely quickly. Don't believe me? Go on ASM and read the topic about microswitches

Want to change airseal parts? The PTS uses a weird cylinder head.

Broke your spring guide? The PTS one is almost impossible to find.

In short, I would say get an A&K and send it to a tech to get it reworked on if you can't do it yourself. The cost of parts and labor may end up being less than the cost of the PTS.

Note, this is coming from a guy who has owned 4 A&Ks and 3 PTS' (I like masadas, just situations kept occurring where I never held onto one for a long time).

7
Pre-Publication Peer Review / ACM Elcan SpecterDR 1-4x Scope
« on: November 26, 2011, 02:31:35 AM »

<ACM Elcan SpecterDR 1-4x Scope> review by <Lon3Wo1f>
Discuss this review here.


Table of Contents:
Introduction
Ordering
Basic Gun Information
First impressions/Packaging
Included
Launcher Specifications
Externals
Trademarks
Magazines
Performance
Internals
Modifications
Pros/Cons
Overall

Introduction

When the mention of a clone of the futuristic SpecterDR was announced, the airsoft world was taken by storm. The early models priced well above $170, were restricted to 4x, and were extremely rare. The variable zoom model initially started with a price of 250+, and had various problems such as poor eye relief and failure to zero correctly. Today, I will be reviewing one of the least expensive models to date, coming in at a low $130.

Ordering

I ordered this scope from EBairsoft for $130, available here. Shipping was included in the price, but it took nearly a month and a half to arrive from Hong Kong. Customers have reported both longer and shorter shipment times, and based on past experience, I agree with their assessment.

Basic Information

In 2003 the US SOCOM started to upgrade its fire control accessories for the M4 Carbine. The key technological objective for the day optic was – “to provide not only a long-range deliberate aiming capability, but also a short range, positive, rapid aiming capability for Close Quarters Battle…in a single sight” – a critical issue in urban combat. Raytheon ELCAN Optical Technologies met this need by proposing and demonstrating the SpecterDR™ dual role rifle sight, a high performance switchable 1x- 4x dual-field-of-view (DFOV) combat optic. SpecterDR™ is given the designation SU-230/PVS in the SOPMOD Block 2 kit.

Copied from elcan.com

Product Description/First Impressions:
<First thoughts regarding product features, finish, and packaging>

The SpecterDR arrived in very minimal packaging, but unharmed nonetheless. The outside container was devoid of any brand naming, with the exception of a sticker bearing the marking "1x-4x Elcan". Included with the scope is a cleaning cloth, two 2032 button batteries, and and 3 interchangeable backup iron sights.

From a quick glance, the coating appeared to be highly matte and lettering was nice and crisp. I was initially confused about the lack of rear iron sights, until my mind put two and two together and realized that we were given a choice of sights to use.

Externals


Internals

The lens are amazingly clear and the zoom is focused at each magnification.

The central dot is illuminated, which is a nice touch. While it could be brighter, it is functional.

The levers and mounts hold firmly in place, so it seems more than usable.

Power/Magazines

The SpecterDR takes CR2032 batteries, stored within the illumination knob. My knob cap was screwed in off center, and required a pair of pliers to unscrew it. Once that was remedied, I was able to unscrew and reattach it with just hand power.

Performance Characteristics:

The dot is rather dim, and can easily be lost in bright light. However, the center of the crosshairs are remain visible because they are black.

The main selling point of the scope, the zoom, is more or less crippled because of its inability to hold the zero between the two zoom levels. When shifting between the two magnifications, the center shifts up and to the left from 1x-4x and vice versa from 4x-1x.

Eye relief is simply amazing and the large objective lens gathers plenty of light. I measured the relief to be close to be almost 3.5-4 inches, which is excellent for those with bulky masks.

Accessories/Modifications

The SpecterDR contains two screw points on top, which can be used to attach Doctor sights.

Skirmish Results

By zeroing the scope at 4x, I had no problem in use for field games. While the scope is very heavy in comparison to an EoTech, with enough use I stopped paying attention to its bulk.

The base cost of these optics ensured that very few were out on the field with me, and I received my share of envious stares.

Attached to my DMRs, the 4x function suitable for the role, while my standard rifles were fine with being re-zeroed at 1x. While I would like the ability to switch between the two zooms, situations never really did come up where I absolutely needed both magnifications.

Conclusion:

While the SpecterDR did not perform at the expected level, I would still recommend it as opposed to an ACOG simply because of the far superior eye relief. I have found ACOG clones to be barely functional due to their poor eye relief, whereas the SpecterDR simply excels in that aspect. Considering the two are at relatively similar price points, the fact that the SpecterDR can switch between the two zoom levels seals the deal in my opinion.

The optic is weighty and will be instantly noticed on any replica, but over time the user will barely notice the additional bulk. For any airsofters looking to replicate the SOPMOD Block II kit, the $130 ACM SpecterDR will be a welcomed purchase compared to the $1500 price tag of the RS version.

End Notes:

For those looking to order from EBairsoft, be patient with their shipment times. While they rank among the slowest shippers in my experience, they have never not gotten me my order.

Written by Lon3Wo1f, 11/25/11

8
Airsoft News / Re: Booligan's News and Reviews - 10/09/11
« on: October 11, 2011, 12:03:35 AM »
I know, but I love reading Booligan's reviews over any other reviewer out there. Nicely organized, no engrish, and actually informative. I'll take anything I can get, but I haven't seen any reviews for those specific ones yet.

9
Airsoft News / Re: Booligan's News and Reviews - 10/09/11
« on: October 10, 2011, 10:15:32 PM »
Review these please:

Polar Star Pr15/Fusion Engine
WE M14 EBR
King Arms M4 GBB
Bravo/Lonex Complete Gearbox
AIM TOP Complete Gearbox
AIM TOP SS Tightbores

10
To any admin who may happen to read this, I just happened to pick up the CO2 bolt and am wondering if it should be included as part of the review, or as its own separate item.



*Also, the lack of pictures is only temporary until my new tripod comes in.

11
The Screening Room / Re: the hangover - PART 2
« on: June 15, 2011, 08:01:07 PM »
Anyone but me puke a little in their mouths during the shemale "pictures" in the credits section?

But greatest section:

(Last section)
Stu: Watch out, I have a demon in me.
Alan: Yes, semen.

12
Gun Modifications/Parts/Accessories / Re: How to achieve 300-400 RPM
« on: June 09, 2011, 09:12:54 PM »
300 rpm is 5 rounds a second. Try using a guarder infinite torque up or ICS 3k motor, infinite torque gears, get really really cheap wiring to increase resistance, install a resistor into the wire that goes to your motor, and maybe an extremely low discharge 7.4 lipo. Also, butcher your shimming and overgrease everything. You *MAY* be able to get it that low.

I don't believe there are any mosfets that can even adjust it to that low, the AWS ones go a minimum of 10 rps.

OP, why are you trying to push it that low? Even a real steel M16 does ~12-15 rps.

13
Pre-Publication Peer Review / Re: WIP Cybergun/Cyma AK47 EBB Rifle
« on: April 09, 2011, 07:23:38 PM »
If you upload to imageshack, you can choose to have your pics be placed as thumbnails under the "share my pictures" section. It's preformatted to show as thumbnails on forums.

14
I've heard amazing things about the JG M93 (red motor). Don't take my word on this, but I believe they are more powerful than an element motor.

15
Are these full Ti? As in not just Ti coated like their pistons and other parts?

Do you know if these are CNC'd, cast, or made through some other method?

17

Socom Gear Cheytac M200 review by Lon3Wo1f
Discuss this review here.

This review is from an external point of view and will have no comments on any internals that require disassembly.

Table of Contents:
Basic Info - Real Steel info, Specs, Pricing, Source, Accessories
Products Descriptions/First Impressions
Externals
Power/Magazines
Accessories/Modifications
Upgrades
Skirmish Results
Conclusion
End Notes

Basic Information
Real Steel info:

The CheyTac Intervention is an American bolt action sniper rifle manufactured by Randy Kobzeff for long range soft target interdiction. It is fed by a detachable single stack magazine, which holds 7 rounds. It fires .408 CheyTac or .375 CheyTac ammunition. CheyTac papers state that the entire system is capable of delivering sub-MOA accuracy at ranges of up to 2,500 yards (2,300 m), one of the longest ranges of all modern-day sniper rifles. It is based on the EDM Arms Windrunner.

Credits to Wikipedia

Specs:
Weight: 19.6 lbs unloaded, 21.2 lbs w/ magazine and shells (will detail this bit later).
Length: 47 inches with the stock retracted, 54 inches fully extended.

Price: MSRP $1200

Source: AirsoftGI.com, can be found here

Accessories: Package comes with Socom Gear hard case, 5 Shells, 1 Magazine, Gun, Gas bolt, and Manual

Product Description/First Impressions:
<First thoughts regarding product features, finish, and packaging>

Picking up the case, my first thought was WOW, the M200 is heavy. The included hard case is decent, but it doesn't compare to the quality of a Pelican hard case, more like a Plano. The eggshell foam is protective, and I don't see any problems coming from it.

After popping open the case, your eyes will be greeted with an instruction manual, magazine, bolt, bolt handle, package of shells, and the actual M200. Unlike the M82, you will not be receiving any certificate of authenticity.

The finish on the M200 is amazingly matte. It barely reflects light (aside from the orange flash hider), and seems fairly scratch resistant. The entire gun is extremely solid, without any noticeable flexing. My only trouble with it is the fact that the bipod legs are neither secured into the outer casing, nor spring loaded. Aside from the pistol grip and stock butt, the entire construction is made of metal. Socom Gear claims it is CNC'd aluminum, but I have no sure way to test if this is true.

Externals

Starting from the stock end, you will notice that the rubber pad is extremely thick. It is in a concave shape, with the ends being close to 2 inches thick while the middle is about 1 inch thick. The rear monopod can cleverly be folded into the stock, but when extended and screwed in, it is extremely solid. On top of the stock is a non-adjustable, solid metal cheek rest.

The stock is attached to the gun by two solid metal rods, which in turn are slotted into two equally stable mounts. The stock has 4 points of retraction, but the gun is only usable at the furthest two positions.

The pistol grip is made of a polymer and nylon mixture. The material isn't quite as pleasing to grip as a Magpul PTS Pmag, but it is solid and does its job. It is attached by a single screw underneath.

The body/receiver is powder coated, with engraved markings of the Cheytac trademark and accompanying words. The indicators of Safe/Fire are also engraved into the body.

Regarding the safety, the trigger is not physically blocked, but simply detached from the actual firing mechanism, while the safety is engaged.

Like the majority of the gun, the handle is made of metal. It's mounting is extremely rugged, and can easily carry the weight of the rifle.

The outer barrel sheath is mounted without any play but is not powder coated. This will cause for wear to appear where the bipod is mounted.

The bipod is mounted on the barrel sheath, and can be adjusted to the user's preference. However, the legs are not spring loaded, so take care while extending them or one may be lost. Like the monopod, the bipod can easily take the weight of the rifle.

The actual barrel is rather odd. It has a fair amount of play in all directions, but will not rotate. The entire muzzle is metal, but is painted with a ridiculous amount of orange.

The magazine is made of stamped steel, but its coating may be scratched while insertion into the gun. It seems resistant to most forms of damage, but if it receives too much punishment, replacement magazines can be purchased at $90 each.

Power/Magazines
Gas is charged directly into an inlet valve on top of the bolt. Socom Gear recommends using green gas or propane.

Only proprietary shells and magazines may be used, and this model is NOT compatible with STAR/Ares M200 parts.

Reloading the gun can either be a two step or one step process. The user can either load up to 7 shells into the magazine, which is then slid into the receiver AK style (a notch on the front magazine is locked in, the magazine rocked back into the receiver), or a shell can be chambered directly into the bolt. The bolt-loading method can only be used to chamber one round at a time.

Take care not to lose any shells, as they are expensive. Only Socom Gear shells can be used, and can (at time of writing 4/28/11) be found at a handful of US stores. Price is $35 for a package of 5 shells.

The M200 also uses 8mm bbs. While these bbs are not rare, they are costly when compared with standard 6mm bbs.

Performance Characteristics:
<How does the gun perform, power, accuracy, etc>
Testing was done with Bioshot 8mm bbs. The bolt was filled with propane for 5 seconds, allowed to settle for 1 min, then another 5 second charge was used. Average temperature during testing was 76 degrees Fahrenheit.

FPS:
Bioshot 8mm .34s

334
321
328
326
329

Average with .34 - 327.6

Bioshot 8mm .45s

308
306
299
290
287

Average with .45 - 298

Obviously, this gun is not nearly as consistent as standard gas rifles. Hopefully the CO2 bolt will solve some of the FPS inconsistencies.

Accessories/Modifications
Upgrades are limited to whatever the user can fit onto the rail. This includes lasers, scopes, grenade launchers, etc. To do this gun justice, large scopes with 50mm+ objective lens should be mounted.

Upgrades:
Internally, there is not much to replace. Unless the user has access to a precision machine shop, upgrading the 8mm inner barrel will be difficult. Finding 8mm hopup components will also be a problem. Socom Gear has stated that a CO2 bolt will be released in the future.

However, the internals appear to be well made, so repairs are not needed for out of box usage.

Skirmish Results
<How does the gun fair on the field>
Like the Socom Gear M82, this M200 is not for the light hearted, weak, or short. This beast is usable on a field, but only up to a certain extent. While I was able to score some hits, my effective range topped out at just over 150 ft. However, the 8mm rounds do make a difference. I was able to punch through light foliage to hit my targets where 6mm rounds were unable to penetrate. Also, the 8mm impacts are instantly noticeable to the targets I nailed and I had no problems with people not calling their hits.

The main disadvantage I faced was the lack of ammo when compared to more tradition sniper platforms such as VSRs or L96 based guns. Having only 7 rounds per magazine makes me conclude this is not a skirmishable replica, but much more of a hyper realistic/expensive collector's item. While it was not effective as a skirmish weapon, the showpiece function makes up for its shortcomings as I was immensely entertained as other people gaped at the sheer size.

Conclusion:
To anyone even considering acquiring one of these beasts, understand that this is not built as a skirmishable replica. Its size, magazine capacity, weight, price, and firing action simply makes skirmishing too expensive. These are best used for target shooting, movie props, or collector's items.

Assuming that you don't mind dropping 1200+ on an unskirmishable gun, then by all means get it. There is not any airsoft model that will get as close to its real counterpart as the Socom Gear M200 Intervention is to the original Cheytac. I have had no qualms about dumping such a high figure into a replica that, in my eyes, is a work of art to be displayed.

If a skirmishable gun is desired, pick up a Socom Gear M82 or Real Sword SVD. If you want to be the envy of your friends, team mates, and everyone else at events, pick up the M200.

End Notes:
<Any last important info about the products/review

Written by <Insert Screenname>, <Insert Date>

18
I'll take one. I have guns and setups that vary tremendously, including a KWA'd Barrett M82, Magpul PTS Masada, Ares SL9, etc. I have also done setups that include 45+ rps @ 320 fps to 20 rps @ 530 fps.

19
Interesting...so this is a VFC clone. I could have sworn that it was going to be a CA clone...

Anyways, it's priced at roughly ~260, which is about the same price as the A&K Masada. Hopefully the quality between the two will be comparable (I'm talking about the quality of externals). What I'm really wondering about is the price of magazines. If this is compatible with VFC Mags, we can only pray that the price of those mags will drop from their ridiculous levels down to some more affordable ones.

20
Want to give me 50% off the AIM TOP G36c so I can write a review?  ;D

And do you sell spare mags for the KJW carbine?

21
Custom Gun Works / Re: WA2000 - Candyman style
« on: February 22, 2011, 01:50:50 AM »
Oh baby. Simply amazing. Words can't describe this, hence the fragmented sentences.

What is the firing mechanism? (AEG Gearbox, VSR based, Tanaka M700, etc)

22
Gun Modifications/Parts/Accessories / Re: HK 417 build, need advice
« on: February 05, 2011, 08:39:44 PM »
1. Any idea where I can get an ACM 20" barrel?

2. I have a plethora of Magpul 7.62s from my SR-25 that I eventually converted into a 7.62 CASV carbine (I know it's not right, but I enjoy the feeling of the CASV rail). Sorry for not mentioning that.

3. According to http://world.guns.ru/assault/de/hk-417-e.html if you look at the last picture, I am not too sure what type of grip it is. Tango down sure doesn't look like it.

4. Any idea how to replicate the 20" rail look? I should have specified that I was going for the sniper variant. If needed, I guess I could always get ahold of another 416 rail unit, and then have it cut and welded to continue the length so it can be more authentic.

23
Gun Modifications/Parts/Accessories / HK 417 build, need advice
« on: February 05, 2011, 08:06:59 PM »
So i'm going to be making my very own HK417, based off of an extended v2 build.

I know I should either go with parts that can't break or with parts so cheap I don't mind replacing, I'll probably be going the second route.

So anyways, this is my current proposal:

Receiver - CA Sr25. I know the 416 rail system is taller, so in order to match everything up, I'll be cutting off the stock rail, then welding in a spare rail set I have. Have it
Gearbox shell - CA 7mm Extended v2 Have it
Gearset - SHS Gears for SR25/L85
Piston - SHS SR25/L85 full metal rack
Cylinder - Guarder PSG-1 cylinder (have a spare one)
Cylinder head - SHS V2
Air nozzle - Energy Sr25 w/ o-ring
Piston Head - Element Orange Bearing Head have it
Motor - Element Ultra Torque
Spring guide - SHS steel v2 spring guide
Bushing - SHS 7mm steel bushings
Hopup - King Arms M4 metal hopup
Bucking - Systema Have it
Nub - SCS
Barrel - Madbull 6.03
Trigger/wiring - AWS Stealth or Pulse
RIS - Echo 1 614 set (currently on sale from evike), will I need a special barrel nut to mount it on? If so, please direct me where to get it. And if it is not compatible, I'll just weld on the RIS onto the body
Pistol grip - ACM Magpul MOE (I know it isn't correct, but I have a spare I might as well use) have it
Stock - ACM Magpul PRS (ironically, it is more rare than the PTS version, might as well use it on my one of a kind build...) have it
Outer barrel - 5ku m4 outer barrel set
Other mods/work - X-rings, correct AOE, deans, shim/grease

Anything else I am forgetting?

24
Airsoft News / Re: Redwolf Airsoft : New products
« on: February 03, 2011, 08:10:35 PM »
Yummy. I know the timeline isn't correct, but I really think that a SpecterDR would look great on that.

25
Also, King Arms grenades use 3mm ball bearings. You can order them in that size here: 9292K33

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 6

Page created in 0.354 seconds with 24 queries.